We believe that the views of the vast majority of the British public have been silenced and ignored when it comes to criminal justice system.
Seven in ten (70%) of the general public (in England and Wales) said that sentences were too lenient, while less than one in five (17%) said that they think they were about right, and only 4% said they were too tough, according to the research published by the Sentencing Council in August 2019.
This is even higher among former police officers when they were asked about their experience and views in our own recent research. Out of 1,183 respondents 72.2% thought that sentencing for criminals in England & Wales were too lenient, and further 18.9% responded that they were lenient. 5.5% thought sentencing was right or about right and 0.4% thought it was harsh (3 people) or too harsh (1 person). There were also 3% of respondents commented that the sentencing was hit and miss, not adequate, unfair and lenient.
Last but definitely not least the view of 82% of victims of crime was that sentences handed to criminals were lenient.
Until now these voices have not been represented by a single organisation that calls for honesty in sentencing.
Our sentencing system in England & Wales makes mockery of the criminal justice system and it does not deter criminals from reoffending. Hardly any criminal serves a full jail time as determined by the Courts.
We at Restore Justice think that for far too long the successive governments and Justice Secretaries listened to those who often treat criminals as if they were the real victims, and try to hide behind words such as rehabilitative or restorative. But these are often proposals of measures that are designed to reduce arrests of some groups of criminals, significantly reduce custodial sentences, and make sure that criminals are released from prison even earlier than automatically at the halfway point. Some of these proposals also involve other than prison options for career and dangerous criminals. As a result, the sentencing system is complex and confusing which has also contributed to sentences being soft and dishonest.
Most criminals do not go behind bars after being convicted of their first offence. We need to remember that those criminals in prison are convicted by the Courts and sent there after committing numerous offences (see our statistics section) and they deserve to serve a full sentence not just two-thirds, 50%, or less. The restorative and rehabilitative aspects of a sentence cannot work if the punishment aspect for the crime isn't there.
We campaign for honesty in sentencing which means that we believe in fairness and equality in sentencing of criminals. There is nothing controversial in it - it's called justice.